Professional Workshop Modules


Customized to Your Needs


Below are the Professional Workshop Modules the Center for Educational Improvement offers. Click on any title you are interested in (or the question mark to its right) to learn more about it. Also, note that we are able to customize these modules to meet your needs. Translation into Spanish and/or Spanish interpretation is available.

Introductory Workshops

Select your combination of modules for 1-5 day workshops or we will review your school data and needs and provide recommendations to you. We also provide technical assistance consultation to administrators and school leaders. Note all of the workshops are available throughout the school year. Some are available as 1-3 hour sessions.

Behavior Intervention Supports (PBIS)

PBIS is a proven approach to schoolwide discipline. Reduce your office referrals, suspensions, and expulsions. Involve your teachers in handling many problems in their classrooms before behaviors escalate; and establish expectations and consequences for cafeterias, behavior in halls, and common spaces. We will help you set up data recording systems and PBIS teams. Learn about Tier I, II, and III students and approaches for each; design effective student incentives; improve school climate. Special considerations for the unique needs of elementary, middle, and high schools.

Classroom Environment

Teachers set the tone for the year within the first few days. This workshop includes practical recommendations for organizing classrooms for learning and building community with children.

Closing Achievement Gaps

We will review your data for the past 3 years and provide our recommendations for intensive targeted professional development for teachers. We will provide background theory and research on underperforming subgroups, review the most effective strategies for urban minorities, and give teachers experience designing academic interventions to improve academic achievement.

Coaching Lead & Mentor Teachers

A training and orientation session for teachers interested in becoming mentor coaches, as well as those who have been selected by their schools and are already serving in this role. Our trainers assist participants in designing plans for coaching and mentoring teachers at your school. Session includes useful observation and feedback forms.

Co-Teaching

General and special education teachers teaming for improved instruction and outcomes for ALL students. We have developed standardized modules on the 7 types of co-teaching, self assessments, co-teaching goal setting, and continuous improvement strategies to raise student achievement. Available as a 2-day initial workshop, with opportunities for ongoing observation, feedback, and training on a contractual basis with schools. We recommend at least 3 sessions.

Curriculum Development & Alignment

We will review your curriculum mapping process or assist you in developing and revising your alignment based on state assessment scores. Three options are available: (1) we lead a team of teachers in reviewing and developing or revising curriculum or curriculum maps; (2) we review your existing documents and make recommendations; or (3) we start with #1 or 2 and then continue monitoring and assisting teachers in curriculum pacing.

Data-Driven Instruction

Research shows that schools are most in need of training about how to use data for making decisions about instruction. Data-driven instruction is one of the foremost strategies for improving student achievement. Teachers respond to the priorities of administrator. We will help administrators and teacher leaders set up procedures and expectations and/or teach teachers about how to discuss data in team meetings. Also includes targets and templates for daily or weekly monitoring of student performance.

Deep Learning

Students today spend time surfing the web and bouncing from topic to topic and idea to idea. They are constantly multi-tasking: listening to MP3s and IPODs, watching videos, texting, and holding conversations. What are the implications for shifts in reading comprehension and thinking? What are practical strategies to insure that students are using higher level critical thinking skills? How can students be taught to self-monitor and increase the quality of the learning that occurs? These questions will be considered and teachers will be provided the opportunity and guidance for structuring Deep Learning experiences – including the use of appropriate rubrics and other evaluative tools.

Global Education

Faculty will present on their experiences teaching abroad in developing countries, and participants will reflect on their experiences and understanding of education overseas. Teachers will (1) discuss implications for their instruction, (2) review research on why students in particular countries out-perform others on specific standardized tests, and (3) have the opportunity to design a set of learning activities for students based around global themes and the economy, environment, consumerism, social attitudes and mores, politics, and culture.

Also includes information on the International Baccalaureate and Cambridge International Accreditation Programs.

Improving Classroom Instruction

This workshop covers strategies from the Institute on Educational Sciences and the What Works Clearinghouse. Strategies are reviewed, templates provided, and teachers are given opportunities to modify their plans to incorporate these strategies.

Improving Fluency and Mastery

Standards for mastery for fluency and mastery for reading, math, and writing at various grade levels. Includes information from the foremost Precision Teaching web sites. Covers strategies for improving fluency, data collection and data analysis.

In-School Observation and Coaching

Contract with our faculty to combine workshops with in-school observation and coaching. We recommend that schools begin with weekly monitoring and coaching and then fading back so that by mid-year coaching is provided on a bi-weekly basis. For the greatest impact, combine this program with quarterly workshops.

Integrating the Arts

Learn about research-based strategies for infusing arts across the curriculum. Instructors will share information from research projects with national arts integration communities of practice, and universal design incorporating art with museum research for all students, including students with disabilities. Review and critique arts integration rubrics. Participants will experience a hands-on lesson for designing their own arts infused units.

Professionalism and Cultural Literacy

This may be offered as a combined module or the module could be divided into two sessions.

(a) Professionalism. What does it mean to be a teacher? What are the standards for the profession? What are the expectations for your attendance, reporting in teaming, lesson planning, grading, substitute folders, and professional portfolios? How much should you share with your colleagues? What information might be considered confidential? How should you prepare for an observation by your administrator? How can you establish good relationships with your students, peers, and administrators? Practical considerations for first year teachers.

(b) Cultural Literacy. What is the difference between cultural sensitivity and cultural literacy? What steps can be taken to enhance your cultural sensitivity and literacy? How do ethnicity, race, and socio-economic status impact instruction and learning in schools and interacting with parents and students whose lives and life experience may be very different from your own? Increasing your cultural sensitivity and cultural literacy is an ongoing process. Practical tips for teachers stepping into inner-city schools

Response to Intervention (RTI) as a Framework

Based on the best research available, we design programs to meet your school’s specific needs, based on the curriculum you are using, protocols that are effective in your school, and your desire for improvement. Response to Intervention is the new SST (or student case management) process. By designing your school’s 3 Tiers of Intervention we can tailor how you provide effective prevention services. We find that it is useful to provide technical assistance to administrators and to follow-up with additional workshops. This session can be modified according to grade levels (elementary, middle, or secondary) or if you already have a RTI system, we can review that system and recommend strategies for improvement.

Rules & Procedures

Establishing simple, easy to understand rules and procedures is critical to a successful school year. Faculty will discuss how to build classroom communities, establishing rules with students, shortcuts to effective plans, and schoolwide behavior management plans.

Problem-Based Instruction

Critical thinking skills can be advanced through problem based instruction. Learn how to choose problems for exploration, provide a stimulus for student learning, set up learning teams, and design rubrics for evaluating team results. Participants work in cross-disciplinary teams to simulate student problem solving using an inquiry based approach.

School Improvement Planning

We work with your school team on school improvement planning. This includes reviewing and analyzing data and designing a plan for school improvement. If you already have a plan, we review the plan and make recommendations for next steps.

Secret to Student Success: the Wow! Factor

Faculty model an array of strategies to add mystery and drama to your classroom. Up your teaching game and be a stronger competitor with simple, easy to implement techniques. Today, students are bombarded with technology and highly interactive multimedia experiences. Change your classroom, timing, and approach to get and maintain student attention.

Shortcuts to Effective Lesson Planning

We review your lesson plan format and guide your consideration about whether to continue with that format or adopt another format. We present the big MAC approach to lesson planning (Big Ideas, Materials, Accommodations, and Closure — elements of which can be used with any approach). Participants are led through a series of activities where they consider the standard of learning, essential questions, and alternative instructional procedures. Participants develop and share plans, including use of a “hook” or introduction, as well as instruction and guided practice.

Student-Led IEPs

When students are working toward goals that they have selected and agreed to, their performance tends to improve. Learn how to teach students about their disability, their rights, and the IEP process. Strategies are given for various grade levels.

Student Self-Governance and Lesson Planning

This session focuses on middle and high school students. Participants learn about student self-governance and self-determination and given opportunities for incorporating this approach into their lesson plans.

Teacher Accountability & Incentives

Learn about teacher performance pay – options, and the impact of teacher incentives.

The Ohio Improvement Planning Process

Explanations about expectations of the Ohio Department of Education. This session could be an introductory workshop, or could include our assistance in designing and implementing your school’s Focused Plan, as well as assistance with the Implementation, Measurement and Monitoring (IMM) process.

Timing and Pacing Instruction

With limited time to cover content and teach to mastery, teachers need to consider strategies for emphasizing priority materials. So you have a curriculum pacing guide. How do you stay on track? During this session teachers practice effective and ineffective ways to pace instruction.

Urban Adolescents

Includes a review of the highlights of adolescent psychology as well as research on urban males and females, including learning styles. Consideration of the needs and interests of various ethnic groups, differences among ethnic groups, and how teachers can adapt instruction to engage adolescents.

Virtual Learning

Are you using or considering virtual learning or online learning modules? A review of five of the most popular modules, as well as considerations of the pros and cons of each. Includes strategies for adapting modules for credit recovery, at-risk youth, and youth with learning disabilities.

When and How to Reteach

There is a tendency today, especially with older students to not reteach. Yet sometimes the most effective approach to increase student learning is to stay with a topic until a student masters the skill or knowledge. Includes guidelines for reteaching, including making decisions about reteaching, as well as how to present the information the second or third time around.

What Does Technology Have to Offer for 21st Century Learning?

21st Century Skills do not replace content knowledge. Rather, they are complementary building blocks to help students gain knowledge in ways that are more engaging. The convergence of data, voice, graphics, and live video on low-end computers and smartphones is providing real-time information access and exchange in schools. While this course is an overview, in-depth workshops on specific skills or technologies can be provided

Technology-Supported Critical Thinking

Critical 21st Century thinking skills are important because we are constantly confronted with situations that demand judgment. For example, students get 4 million hits when using a search engine and must identify the five of greatest value. Learners encounter online sources that are contradictory, incomplete, inaccurate, or biased. 21st century problem solving also requires input from across disciplines and across the curriculum. This workshop will address how you can build deeper understanding, better questioning skills, and more active student involvement in the content and concepts you teach.

Technology Infused Communication Skills

21st century communication skills are vastly different than the linear, standalone, means of communication of the past. Students growing up in the 21st century live in a technology-infused world marked by a 24/7 flow of global information. Yet students must be able to actively listen and effectively express themselves across media, even when their communication preference is online texts, tweets, or Facebook entries. This workshop will show you ways to use new technologies, YouTube, DIIGO, Wikis, etc., to appeal to the hyper-connected MySpace generation. Designed to help you teach students so that they can express complex ideas through mixed-media projects.

Executive Skills & Self-Directed Learners

Throughout the K-12 years, students are developing their metacognitive skills and teachers can play a critical role in enhancing and speeding up executive skills acquisition. Learn how you can coach students to increase their attention span, pursue goal-directed activities, and plan and manage their time more effectively. Discover ways to help students create organizational structures, develop emotional control, and increase their flexibility so they can become increasingly independent, goal-oriented, and self-directed learners.

Metacognitive Skills for Teachers

Professional development and continuous learning requires that teachers recognize what is working well, what they need to changed, and how to improve. Enhance your metacognitive skills including reflection, planning, positive self-talk, and self-regulation to strengthen your teaching practices and classroom interactions.

School Improvement Services: Monitoring, Report Development & Technical Assistance

We provide school improvement officers to guide and monitor your school improvement process. Services available for Tier I, II, and III schools. CEI staff review your short cycle and annual yearly data and make recommendations for schools, classes, and individual student learning plans. Ohio Improvement Planning trained and certified facilitators. In Washington DC experienced staff have been trained in the DC review process and have served on review panels for individual schools.

Latest Blog Posts

  • Visioning the Future of Schools….Visioning the Future
    August 19, 2011

    How closely is the future of schools correlated with the future for all globally? Any guesses?

    What are the 5 top trends in education today? Perhaps: Common Core Standards; Global Competition for the U.S.; more rigor; more technology; and school improvement.  Other recent initiatives: STEM, Charter Schools, project-based learning, preparation for college, and the small school movement– schools within schools. At least for those of us in the U.S. What about internationally?  Some of the global issues – not sure we can call them trends– are education of girls; use of mobile technologies; greater access to college for more, and the International Baccalaureate and Cambridge accreditation programs– so demonstration of meeting international standards.  With the IB and Cambridge come a host of related programs/expectations such as demonstration of knowledge through team collaboration, Socratic seminars, and advanced placements. Where will youth who are completing programs with these trends end up?  Will they become the innovators and scientists of tomorrow? Will they become world leaders?  How will their leadership differ from world leaders today?

    Does any of this make a difference?  Will businesses tomorrow be operated by different standards, values, or principles because of changes in education today?  Will the standard of living continue to rise for countries that expand educational opportunities?  If we were to take several snapshots of classrooms in America today– perhaps at different grade levels, would we begin to see a picture of where our nation is headed? A picture of the work ethic?

    In the U.S. today, there is a heavy emphasis on achievement, learning more, handling more knowledge, demonstrating higher levels of skills.  Will these pieces combine for a future where America continues to lead the world in innovations?  Will that translate to a higher standard of living for Americans in the next 10 years?  Are we able to predict? Does it/will it make a difference?

     

     

     

  • Testing and Common Core
    April 8, 2011

    The “moment of truth” is arriving as students across the country are taking standardized state assessments. Teachers and administrators are both asking “what else can we do?” and simultaneously lamenting the amount of time and energy that goes into test prep and testing. One school discusses peppermint candies for energy; another will have plenty of water on hand to keep students hydrated. Schools are sending notes to parents about the importance of meals and sleep during test week, even as the schools also review their school breakfast and lunch menus to get the most out of these nutrition bursts. Some students will be “paid” for good results, at other schools; students will be rewarded for coming to school during test week.

    Over the past few months, schools and teachers have strategized about ways to make up for lost time — how to help students “catch up” and improve memory skills. Many classes have increased the use of review games such as “Jeopardy” and others have spent hours going over key vocabulary words — words such as “analyze or compare” to help students understand tasks and also  key vocabulary words that will help students understand reading passages. There are even published lists of recommended vocabulary words available online.

    A lot “to do” over….? Well, not exactly nothing. Because under NCLB students are scoring better. We have seen improvements in academic achievement. However, with the Common Core Standards comes an important opportunity to shift how schools approach instruction and assessment of knowledge. So the next two years will be a critical time to take the focus off of minutiae and put it on understanding key concepts. Higher order thinking skills are more integral to the new Common Core Standards. Interesting….so the “truth” about academic achievement – the state of education – will shift with the new measures.  As we leave this “window of testing” and head into the home stretch for the Spring of 2011, schools have an opportunity to begin looking forward and gearing up for the standards to come. This will require a paradigm shift as educators compare their curricula pacing guides to the new standards. As some leading educators have recommended, this may require “leaving things out of the curricula” rather than “squeezing more in.” This could come as a welcome relief to many. And it could present an opportunity to consider again the role of schools, the needs of students, and how to leave behind some of the excess baggage that has been a part of NCLB.

  • Drawing Students into the World of Literature
    March 19, 2011

    Today’s Blog is by Jacque Hayden, English Teacher at Hospitality High Public Charter School in Washington DC

    Drawing Students Into the World of Literature
    Jacque Hayden M.Ed.

    As a teacher of urban youth I have often been challenged with getting my students to read literature that they may not have been exposed to or may initially feel intimidated by. Building excitement, making real-world/life connections, and offering meaningful projects with a range of options has been the key to getting my students to buy into literature of all types. With this approach I am able to open the world and the world of literature to my students in ways that they may otherwise not be exposed to.

    My students are as excited about the class content as I am. In my early years of teaching I realized that my fear, boredom and even intimidation was as contagious to my students as was my joy, love, passion and excitement. I decided then that part of my job as a teacher was that of an actress. If my students are going to be influenced by my attitude and outlook then I better be sure that I communicate what I truly want them to feel about the world of literature. When I introduce a work of literature I am excited. I love it! My students say, “Ms. Hayden you love everything we read. Why do you love books so much?” This lets me know that I am achieving the intended effect.’

    No matter what we are reading I always bring in background information about the historical, political, and religious influences during the time that the literature was written in the form of news clippings, pictures, artifacts or even food. I have the students make connections between what was going on in the world during the time that any piece of literature was written. This helps them see into the world of the author and to understand the motivation and purpose for writing. I also have students compare and contrast the historical, political and religious influences of the time of a work of literature with their world today. This helps them to make personal connections. When students can connect with personal experiences it draws them in.

    My classroom comes alive during conversations in which we look at the world now vs. then. I recall teaching the Scarlet Letter. Students were outraged by the unfair treatment of women. They also came to the conclusion that even though official laws have changed, there are still double standards today for the sexual desires and behaviors of men and women. When discussing the role of women and men in the novel How the Garcia Girls Lost Their Accents, my students were able to compare their own family expectations and traditions and compare those to the experiences of the Garcia sisters. They also had deep discussions about staying true to your culture as well as how the way in which people came to the United States influenced cultural awareness, pride, and expression of both.

    There is no new literature. It is all influenced by human experience, which while it may evolve over time it is inevitably linked to basic human needs, experiences and emotions. This is the message that I challenge my students to prove wrong time and time again. They have not proven me wrong but their desire to explore humanity and to make connections keeps them deeply engaged.

    Projects are frequent in my classroom. I know that students understand the literature when they can write and argue passionately about it. You cannot make valid arguments and speak and write articulately about that which you do not understand. I give general comprehension tests to gauge that my students are reading and generally understand what they are reading but the projects challenge them and require them to go beyond the surface to the depths of literature and human experience.

    When reading Dante’s Inferno part of the literature project required students to take a test based on their own life choices. Their project also included a paper in which they had to create their own “Hell” using Dante’s Hell as a model. Their hell had to have a guide just like Dante and it had to include levels. Having my students complete this project let me know that they not only understood Inferno but they were also taking a good look at themselves and their life decisions. They were completely engaged during the entire experience. Instead of whining about taking a quiz or answering comprehension questions, they came in grabbed their laptops, took out their novels and literature journals, and got to work. The classroom discussions about Inferno and this project were some of the most passionate that I have witnessed in a high school literature classroom.

    My point here is that urban learners can and will read any literature that any other student can and will read. The key is that you must draw students in and make connections. Once you start this process for students they will take over and push themselves deeper and deeper into the discussion and analysis of literature and human experience.

  • The U.S. is Playing Catch-Up: Education in Singapore and Finland
    February 20, 2011

    According to the 2009 Program for Student Assessement (PISA) given by the Organziation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the U.S. placed average in reading, math, and science compared to 57 other countries tested. Finland and Signapore, however, placed in the top tiers of the PISA. So what are these countries doing differently to bring their students to have the highest academic achievement of the world, and how can the U.S. learn from them?

    Finland

    Finland’s educational system has evolved over the years to meet the social and economic needs of its people. Since the 1970s, Finns have strived to improve their education system. According to (OECD), Finland is now rated as the number one country in education.  In recent years, the Finnish approach to curriculum has also evolved. Finns have replaced lengthy prescriptive curriculum guides with shorter, less detailed guides. The current national math curriculum, for example, is under 10 pages. However, the Finnish focus on higher order thinking skills, and the system emphasizes creative problem-solving skills.

    In Finland, there are high expectations for all students, and teachers provide accommodations such as tutoring and remedial specialists to students as soon as assessments confirm a need for such services. Many classrooms have two or more teachers and co-teaching is the norm. When educators found that students had the greatest difficulties in grades 7 through 9, they began to provide more money and time to support these students.

    What of the teachers? All teachers are required to hold Master’s degrees in their field and only the top 10% of the over 5000 applicants are accepted into university education programs. Teaching is a prestigious profession in Finland. Instead of teaching to a standardized test like we do here in the United States, teachers in Finland are able to choose their own books and design their own curriculum.

    Singapore

    Like Finland, Singapore is ranked close to the top according to the results on the PISA test given by the OECD. However, Singapore’s approach to education is very different from Finland’s. Education in Singapore is very systematic and students are broken into different abilities almost their entire educational career as opposed to Finland’s more collective approach. Students in Singapore start their education at a young age, around 3 years old. They continue their schooling in the primary levels at age 6 which is broken into foundation and orientation stages. At the end of their 6 years at the primary level, they must take a Primary School Leaving Exam (PSLE) to determine if they are ready to leave primary grade levels. Students’ performance scores determine their placement in the secondary schools.

    At the secondary level, students are again broken up into “Special,” “Express,” “Normal (Academic)” and “Normal (Technical).” Each category is determined by the score on the PLSE. Recently, however, Singapore has begun to offer an “Integrated Program” in which students are allowed to take 6 years of secondary education and then take the exam for the International Baccalaureate.

    Rigor

    Both Finland and Singapore have infused rigor throughout their educational systems and both countries have high expectations for students. These expectations are based on cultural norms and education is highly regarded and supported by the general populous in both countries. In the U.S., rigor has been assoicated with scores on standardized assessments. While this has produced some increases in test scores, a culture of high expectations has still not inflitrated many schools. What else could be introduced to turn this around?